A LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH FOR SME'S TERM OF REFERENCE, BUDGET PLAN AND COOPERATIVE PROJECT

Dini Ajani  Putri; Muhammad Thariq  Hidayat; Bayu Kharisma; Yudha  Hadian

doi:10.34147/crj.v6i2.280

Authors

Dini Ajani Putri
Muhammad Thariq Hidayat
Bayu Kharisma
Yudha Hadian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34147/crj.v6i2.280

Keywords:

planning, budgeting, logical framework, terms of reference, SMEs

Abstract

One of the most crucial stages in the new system of PP 17/2017 on Synchronization of National Development Planning and Budgeting is creating a comprehensive and accurate Terms of References (TOR) and budget plan, which define all aspects of how line ministries or stakeholders will conduct the priority project. Taking one example of priority projects of the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs, which is called Pusat Layanan Usaha Terpadu/ PLUT KUMKM, this study aims to identify how line ministry (the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs) describes its project and overall perceives the new system of planning and budgeting. Using logical framework approach, this study analyzes a number of documents such as TOR, budget plan, and government plan that related to PLUT KUMKM project. The result shows that the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs needs to improve the perception of the new system since the TOR and budget plan cannot fully describe the project comprehensively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAPPENAS. (2015). Rencana Jangka Menengah Nasional 2015-2019 Agenda Pembangunan Bidang (The National Development Plan 2015-2019 Sectoral Development Agenda). II, 1-1-10–81.

BAPPENAS. (2019). Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Tahun 2019. Pemerataan Pembangunan Untuk Pertumbuhan Berkualitas, 1–441.

BAPPENAS RI. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Pembangunan Nasional. 97.

Couillard, J., Garon, S., & Riznic, J. (2009). The Logical Framework Approach Millennium. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20117

Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the Logical Framework Approach. 28(April 1999), 17– 28.

Kharisma, B., & Wibowo, K. (2019). Consistency of Planning and Budgeting of Basic infrastructure in West Java Province. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 8(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v8i1.28129

OECD. (2018). Asean 2018 Broasting Competitiveness and Inclusive Growth.

Schick, A. (1998). A Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. 143.

Stiglitz, J. E., & Rosengard, J. K. (2015). Economics of the public sector: Fourth international student edition. WW Norton & Company.

Wasono, A., & Maulana, M. (2018). Critical Study on Development Planning and Budgeting in Indonesia. 1–40. Retrieved from https://www.ksi indonesia.org/old/in/file_upload/Critical Study-on-Development-Planning-and Budgeti-06Feb2018150821.pdf

World Bank. (2011). Writing Terms of Reference for an Evaluation: A How-To Guide. https://doi.org/978-1-60244-166-8

Zen, F. (2013). Aligning National-Regional Planning and Budgeting System Fauziah Zen. Pgsp Paper, 9, 1–30